The NDIA have made a very welcome change to their position on Support Coordinators in plan review meetings.
The NDIA has recently articulated its position on Support Coordinators attending plan review meetings, and you may not like what they have said. Evie discusses the implications and offers strategies for working within these guidelines.
Going the extra mile day after day is running many Support Coordinators off their feet. Evie explores what makes this role particularly difficult to sustain and what can be done to support them.
Support Coordinators are critical to your organisation’s success. Sam Paior tell us how to make the most of the relationship with these people who matter.
Earlier this year, we wrote that we were disappointed to see that Peer Workers had been removed from the list of professions who could provide Support Coordination. But now, as Evie reports, that has all changed in the updated Guide to Suitability.
Bronwyn explores the Quality & Safeguarding Rules that will impact Support Coordination providers and practitioners.
We urge the NDIA to rethink their bizarre decision to remove Peer Workers from the list of professions able to deliver Support Coordination.
Here are 10 of the most important questions and answers from our recent Investigating Housing with Support Coordination webinar.
The Summer Foundation have released a report examining the role of Support Coordination in the NDIS and how it can be improved in the future.
Sally Coddington explores what could the transfer of Support Coordination to LAC/ECEI partners mean for Participants and the Scheme.
Evie explores the policy and practice behind two key Support Coordination challenges: its time-limited nature and the role of Local Area Coordinators.
We meet a lot of organisations who are confused about what Support Coordination should look like. This article goes beyond the basics to demonstrate what Support Coordination should look like – and what it should not.
Leighton Jay explores some of the tensions arising from the NDIA’s approach to “conflicts of interest”.