The federal government has set their sights on an overhaul of the NDIS board.
Assistant Social Services Minister, Senator Mitch Fifield is seeking agreement to start the process of appointing new NDIS board members. The new board will favour people with corporate experience in a move that is said to sideline states and people with disability.
The current board is made up of nominees from each of the states, including stalwarts from the Not for Profit sector, NDIS architect Bruce Bonyhady and former Chair of the National People with Disabilities and Carer Council, Rhonda Galbally.
While Minister Fifield argues that the board should be appointed based on their financial acumen, the states argue that it must first and foremost be a representative body.
Shadow Minister for Disability Reform, Jenny Macklin said the restructure “threatens to undermine one of the principles on which the scheme was built: a true partnership between the states, territories and the Commonwealth”.
But Senator Fifield denies that the States will lose control over the NDIS. “The Disability Reform Council, which represents all state and territory governments, must agree to new Board appointments and has a continuing role in providing direction to the Board.”
There is a serious risk that this new emphasis on the corporate sector will conservatise the NDIS and move it away from an approach that focuses on the lived experience of disability, which is critical to the scheme’s success.
The scheme has so far been delivered on time, within budget and with high levels of participant satisfaction.
It is critical that the right people are retained and selected to continue to drive this success as the scheme grows exponentially in the coming years. The question now is whether the Disability Reform Council can find a way to do this in the spirit of the NDIS.
Update: The NDIS board shake-up was discussed in this weekend’s edition of The Conversation. Their article raised a number of valid points – to read it, click here.
Evie is an all rounder, a content guru, an NDIS nerd and DSC pinch hitter. She holds both a Masters degree in Sustainable Development from HEC Paris and a Media Communications degree from the University of Melbourne. Evie has been at DSC since the start and is the engine room of our content driven marketing success. She is an outstanding writer, presenter and digital service developer.
Early in her career, Evie worked on cutting edge Human Centred Design service development strategies for Procter & Gamble in Kenya and Brazil. Evie is an expert in NDIS detail, working with organisations around Australia at all stages of the NDIS journey. She has been influential in building the sector's understanding of NDIS Support Coordination, and is well known for her unique love of sharks and the NDIS Price Guide.
The NDIA have made a very welcome change to their position on Support Coordinators in plan review meetings.
In Part 2 of our series examining the explosive PM v NDIA case, Sara explores where the Tribunal fell on the Participant’s Core budget. The wide reaching case covers Activities of Daily Living, Consumables and Sustaining Informal Supports. It is not one to be missed.
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal is the ultimate testing ground for all things NDIS, which makes it extremely exciting when we see cases like PM v NDIS that cover an exceptional amount of ground. In the first of this two part series, Sara explores the exciting implications rulings from the case will have for providers and Participants.
Despite the positive spin and data burying, Annual Reports are an incredibly important source of information for anyone connected to the Scheme. Sara explores what we have learnt from the latest report.
At long last, the new SIL Provider Pack has arrived. Sara explores some of its fresh new features.
Earlier this year, we wrote that we were disappointed to see that Peer Workers had been removed from the list of professions who could provide Support Coordination. But now, as Evie reports, that has all changed in the updated Guide to Suitability.